IMLS ETD Project Bibliography

From IMLS
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Introduction to ETDs Bibliography

  1. http://www.gwu.edu/~etds/definition.html
  2. http://libguides.phd.antioch.edu/etddefinitionhistory
  3. http://etd.vt.edu/etddefn.html
  4. http://xml.coverpages.org/kipp-etd-dtd.html
  5. Halbert, Martin, Katherine Skinner and Gail McMillan. “Avoiding the Calf-Path: Digital Preservation Readiness for Growing Collections and Distributed Preservation Networks,” Archiving 2009, Arlington, VA, May 2009, p. 86- 91.
  6. Halbert, Martin, Katherine Skinner and Gail McMillan. “Getting ETDs off the Calf-Path: Digital Preservation Readiness for Growing ETD Collections and Distributed Preservation Networks,” ETD 2009: Bridging the Knowledge Divide, Pittsburgh, PA, June 10-13, 2009. Edited by Sharon Reeves. http://conferences.library.pitt.edu/ocs/viewabstract.php?id=733&cf=7
  7. Lippincott, Joan K., and Clifford A. Lynch. "ETDs and Graduate Education: Programs and Prospects." Research Library Issues, no. 270 (June 2010): 6-15. http://publications.arl.org/rli270/7
  8. McMillan, Gail. “ETD Preservation Survey Results.” Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on ETDs, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland. (June 2008) http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/staff/gailmac/ETDs2008PreservPaper.pdf
  9. Skinner, Katherine, and Gail McMillan. "Surveys of Digital Preservation Practices and Priorities in Cultural Memory Organizations." 2009 NDIIPP Partners Meeting, Washington, D.C., June 24, 2009. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/news/events/ndiipp_meetings/ndiipp09/docs/June24/NDIIPP_Partners_2009_ finalRev2.ppt

Guidelines for Implementing ETD Programs Bibliography

Implementation, issues

  1. Lippincott, Joan K. "Institutional Strategies and Policies for Electronic Theses and Dissertations." EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin, no. 13 (2006). http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0613.pdf
  2. Sharon Reeves, Theses Canada. “How to Set Up an ETD Submission Program.” http://www.ndltd.org/resources/how-to-set-up-an-etd-submission-program.
  3. The Guide for Electronic Theses and Dissertations, http://curric.dlib.vt.edu/wiki/index.php?title=ETD_Guide
  4. ProQuest ETD Administrator. http://www.proquest.com/en- US/products/dissertations/etd_administrator.shtml
  5. Lippincott, Joan K., and Clifford A. Lynch. "ETDs and Graduate Education: Programs and Prospects." Research Library Issues, no. 270 (June 2010): 6-15. http://publications.arl.org/rli270/7
  6. Al Salmi J. Factors Influencing the Adoption and Development of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD) Programs, with Particular Reference to the Arab Gulf States. Information Development [serial online]. August 2008;24(3):226-236. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  7. Copeland S, Penman A. The development and promotion of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) within the UK. New Review Of Information Networking [serial online]. May 2004;10(1):19-32. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  8. Fineman Y. ELECTRONIC THESES AND DISSERTATIONS IN MUSIC. Notes [serial online]. June 2004;60(4):893-907. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  9. Swain D. Global Adoption of Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Library Philosophy & Practice [serial online]. Fall2010 2010;12(2):1-7. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  10. Susan H, Lona H, Robert E. Wolverton J. Administration of Electronic Theses/Dissertations Programs: A Survey of U.S. Institutions. Technical Services Quarterly [serial online]. January 2005;22(3):1-17. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  11. Jewell, Christine. [Waterloo] (1999) “Electronic Thesis and Dissertation System: Business Plan.” UW Library Planning and Priorities Group. http://www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/ETD/business_plan.PDF
  12. Jewell C, Oldfield W, Reeves S. University of Waterloo electronic theses: issues and partnerships. Library Hi Tech [serial online]. May 2006;24(2):183-196. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  13. Hall S, Hoover L, Wolverton Jr. R. Publishing Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Reconfiguring Library Services. Technical Services Quarterly [serial online]. October 2003;21(2):63-70. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  14. Yiotis K. Electronic theses and dissertation (ETD) repositories: What are they? Where do they come from? How do they work?. OCLC Systems & Services [serial online]. May 2008;24(2):101- 115. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  15. Early M, Taber A. Evolving in Collaboration: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Workflows in North Carolina. Collaborative Librarianship [serial online]. January 2010;2(1):4-18. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  16. NDLTD Union Catalog Surpasses One Million Electronic Theses and Dissertations. D-Lib Magazine [serial online]. May 2010;16(5/6):14. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  17. Bevan, Simon J. "Electronic Thesis Development at Cranfield University." Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems 39, no. 2 (2005): 100-111. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/1353
  18. Bishop, Patricia, Ruth Marshall, and Debra Winter. "A Robust Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Program at UCF." EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin, no. 3 (2007). http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0703.pdf
  19. El-Bayoumi, Janice, and Lisa Charlong. "The University of New Brunswick's Pilot for an Electronic Theses and Dissertation Program." In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services, 240-246. New York: ACM Press, 2003. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw03/papers/el_bayoumi2/paper.html
  20. Fyffe, Richard, and William C. Welburn. "ETDs, Scholarly Communication, and Campus Collaboration." College & Research Libraries News 69, no. 3 (2008): 152-155. http://crln.acrl.org/content/69/3/152.full.pdf+html
  21. Jones, Richard, Theo Andrew, and John MacColl. "Case Study: The Edinburgh Research Archive." Edinburgh Research Archive, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/859

Metadata

  1. McCutcheon S. Basic, fuller, fullest: Treatment options for electronic theses and dissertations. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services [serial online]. June 2011;35(2/3):64-68. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  2. Wolverton R, Hoover L, Fowler R. Subject Analysis of Theses and Dissertations: A Survey. Technical Services Quarterly [serial online]. April 2011;28(2):201-222. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  3. Chapter 5 Issues of Name Authority Control in the Cataloging of Theses and Dissertations. Technical Services Quarterly [serial online]. September 2, 2008;25:75-94. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  4. Sarkar P, Mukhopadhyay P. CATALOGUING THESES AND DISSERTATIONS: DESIGNING AN INTEGRATED PROCESSING AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM. SRELS Journal Of Information Management 10 [serial online]. August 2011;48(4):377-388. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  5. Boock M, Kunda S. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Metadata Workflow at Oregon State University Libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly [serial online]. May 2009;47(3/4):297- 308. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  6. Strader C. Author-Assigned Keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings. Library Resources & Technical Services [serial online]. October 2009;53(4):243-250. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.

Access

  1. Suber P. Open Access to Electronic Theses and Dissertations. DESIDOC Journal Of Library & Information Technology [serial online]. January 2008;28(1):25-34. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  2. McCutcheon S, Kreyche M, Maurer M, Nickerson J. Morphing metadata: maximizing access to electronic theses and dissertations. Library Hi Tech [serial online]. February 2008;26(1):41-57. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  3. Stock C. Open access to full text and ETDs in Europe: improving accessibility through the choice of language?. Conference Papers: International Conference On Grey Literature [serial online]. December 2008;9:39-47. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.

Preservation

  1. Halbert, Martin and Gail McMillan. “Getting ETDs off the Calf-Path: Digital Preservation Readiness for Growing ETD Collections and Distributed Preservation Networks.” 2009. http://conferences.library.pitt.edu/ocs/viewpaper.php?id=733&cf=7
  2. Gail, McMillan and Katherine Skinner. “NDLTD Preservation Strategy with the MetaArchive Cooperative.” 2009. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/NDLTD/BoD200906/NDLTDPreservationPlan20090606.pdf.
  3. McMiIlan G. Digital Preservation of Theses and Dissertations Through Collaboration. Resource Sharing & Information Networks [serial online]. March 2004;17(1/2):159-174. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  4. DuraCloud. http://www.duracloud.org/
  5. Teper T, Kraemer B. Long-term Retention of Electronic Theses and Dissertations. College & Research Libraries [serial online]. January 2002;63(1):61. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  6. Bakelli Y, Benrahmoun S. Long-Term Preservation of Electronic Theses and Dissertations in Algeria. Libri: International Journal Of Libraries & Information Services [serial online]. December 2003;53(4):254-261. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.

Workflow

  1. Surratt B, Hill D. ETD2MARC: A semiautomated workflow for cataloging electronic theses and dissertations. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services [serial online]. Summer2004 2004;28(2):205-223. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  2. Deng S, Reese T. Customized mapping and metadata transfer from DSpace to OCLC to improve ETD work flow. New Library World [serial online]. May 2009;110(5/6):249-264. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.

Legal issue

  1. Seamans N. Electronic theses and dissertations as prior publications: what the editors say. Library Hi Tech [serial online]. February 2003;21(1):56. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.

Interoperability

  1. OCLC Digital Collection Gateway. http://www.oclc.org/gateway/default.htm
  2. Bell J, Lewis S. Using OAI-PMH and METS for exporting metadata and digital objects between repositories. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems [serial online]. July 2006;40(3):268-276. Available from: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts with Full Text, Ipswich, MA. Accessed February 8, 2012.
  3. Yusop, Zulkefli Bin Mohd. "Malaysia Theses Online (MYTO): An Approach for Managing Universities Electronic Theses and Dissertations." PTSL@UKM Repository (2008). http://eprints.ukm.my/134/

Mandate

  1. Brown, Josh, and Kathy Sadler. Vision, Impact, Success: Mandating Electronic Theses. Case Studies of E-theses Mandates in Practice in the UK Higher Education Sector. London: University College London, 2010. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/116947/

Assessment

  1. Association of Research Libraries. Statistics and Assessment. http://www.arl.org/stats/

Consortia

  1. OhioLINK ETD Center. http://etd.ohiolink.edu/
  2. Texas Digital Library. http://etd.ohiolink.edu/
  3. The Florida Center for Library Automation. http://fclaweb.fcla.edu/node/528

DCC Curation Lifecycle Model

  1. DCC Curation Lifecycle Model, http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model


Collecting Usage Metrics Bibliography

Open access evaluation/impacts

Do open access journals have impact? http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/19.html

OA impact biblio rapid reader

Top five most-cited papers from this bibliography, as measured by Google Scholar

  1. Lawrence, S., Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact,Nature, 31 May 2001 GS Biblio
  2. Harnad, S. and Brody, T., Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 6, June 2004 GSBiblio
  3. Antelman, K., Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? College and Research Libraries, 65(5):372-382, September 2004 GS Biblio
  4. Eysenbach, G., Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles, PLoS Biology, Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2006 GS Biblio
  5. Harnad, S., et al., The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update, Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, March 2008, 36-40 GSBiblio

Giglia, E. (2010). The Impact Factor of Open Access journals: data and trends.ELPUB 2010 International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki (Finland), 16-18 June 2010.http://dhanken.shh.fi/dspace/bitstream/10227/599/72/2giglia.pdf andhttp://hdl.handle.net/10760/14666.

Repository & ETD evaluation/impacts

  1. Thomas, Gwenda, 2008, EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY, OR POSITIONING INNOVATION BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE. DOI: 10.1080/13614570802105992 pages 133-146
  2. Kim, Hyun Hee and Kim, Yong Ho. An Evaluation Model for the National Consortium of Institutional Repositories of Korean Universities. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. vol 43, no 1, 2007.
    1. literature review: content evaluation: size, diversity, quality, selection; users evaluation with some numbers....: management and policy evaluation indicators :
    2. evaluation model
    3. pilot test of the model
  3. Zuccala, Alesia, Oppenheim, Charles, and Dhiensa, Rajveen. Managing and evaluating digital repositories. Information Research Vol 13, no 1, 2008 (Survey )
  4. Schopfel, Joachim & Boukacem-Zeghmouri Cherifa, “Assessing the Return on Investments in GL for Institutional Repositories” in “Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies”, ed. by De Gruyter Saur. 2010. 1-20
    1. (IR costs per item, cost per item request; IR costs per user; IR costs per depositing author;
  5. Jewell, Christine, William Oldfield, and Sharon Reeves. "University of Waterloo Electronic Theses: Issues and Partnerships." Library Hi Tech 24, no. 2 (2006): 183-196
  6. Jones, Richard, Theo Andrew, and John MacColl. "Case Study: The Edinburgh Research Archive." Edinburgh Research Archive, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/859
  7. Proceedings of Tenth International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertation
  8. Online usage statistics for ETDs” by Thomas Dowling, Simon Bevan from last year’s Texas ETD conference https://conferences.tdl.org/index.php/utlibraries/etd2010/paper/view/76
  9. NDLTD conference proceedings: http://www.ndltd.org/events_and_awards/conferences
  10. (need Review, too old? ) http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html “Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-based Indexed, Abstracted, and Full Text Resources.” International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC) (Nov.1998)
  11. Vijayakumar, J. K., and Manju Vijayakumar. "Importance of Doctoral Theses and Its Access: A Literature Analysis." The Grey Journal 3, no. 2 (2007): 67-75.

Graduate Students / Value-added Experience / Impacts to University

  1. Kushkowski, Jeffrey D. "Web Citation by Graduate Students: A Comparison of Print and Electronic Theses." portal: Libraries and the Academy 5, no. 2 (2005): 259-276.
  2. Larivière, Vincent, Alesia Zuccala, and Éric Archambault. "The Declining Scientific Impact of Theses: Implications for Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repositories and Graduate Studies." Scientometrics 74, no. 1 (2008): 109-121. http://www.ost.uqam.ca/Portals/0/docs/articles/2008/Thesis_Scientometrics.pdf
  3. Lippincott, Joan K., and Clifford A. Lynch. "ETDs and Graduate Education: Programs and Prospects." Research Library Issues, no. 270 (2010): 6-15. http://publications.arl.org/rli270/7
  4. Lomax, Joanne. "The Work of the University Theses Online Group: Report of a Survey and Seminar." Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems, no. 4 (1997): 377-382.
  5. Macduff, Colin. "An Evaluation of the Process and Initial Impact of Disseminating a Nursing E-thesis." Journal of Advanced Nursing 65, no. 5 (2009): 1010–1018.
  6. Müller, Eva. "E-theses and the Nordic E-theses Initiative: The Impact of the Joint Work on the Role of the Library." Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries 16, no. 3/4 (2006): 301-305. http://liber.library.uu.nl/publish/articles/000191/article.pdf
  7. Poster from Texas Digital Libraries (student-survey result). 2012

Web metrics

  1. Accuracy Whitepaper for web analytics. http://www.advanced-web-metrics.com/blog/2008/02/16/accuracy-whitepaper/ & http://www.advanced-web-metrics.com/docs/accuracy-whitepaper.pdf
  2. Clifton, Brian (2010) Advanced Web Metrics with Google Analytics, 2nd edition, Sybex.
  3. Plaza, B (2009) Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics: An experiment with time series. Aslib Proceedings, 61(5): 474–482.
  4. Bradley N (2007) Marketing Research. Tools and Techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.)
  6. Mahoney, J & Goertz, G. (2006) A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Political Analysis, 14, 227–249. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017

Library-specific Measures

  1. B Franklin - portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2009 - The Johns Hopkins University Press
  2. ARL, 2010, “E-Metrics: Meausres for Electronic Resources”. available at www.arl.org/stats/initiatives/emetric/index.shtml
  3. LibQual+. http://www.libqual.org/home
  4. http://www.digiqual.org/
  5. http://www.arl.org/stats/initiatives/mines/index.shtml
  6. http://www.arl.org/stats/initiatives/index.shtml

Copyright Issues & Fair Use Bibliography

  1. Adler, P., Aufderheide, P., Butler, B. & Jaszi, P. (2010). Fair use challenges in academic and research libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arl_csm_fairusereport.pdf.
  2. Andrew, T. (2004). Intellectual property and electronic theses. JISC Legal Publications. Retrieved from http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/612.
  3. Association of Research Libraries et al. (2012). Code of best practices in fair use for academic and research libraries. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/code-of-best-practices- fair-use.pdf.
  4. International Communication Association. (June, 2010). Codes of best practices for fair use of scholarly research in communication. Retrieved from http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/sites/default/files/WEB_ICA_CODE.pdf.
  5. Clement, G. (March, 2011). Copyright literacy standards for graduate education: what we know and what we need. Paper contributed to Texas ETD Association Annual Conference (3rd), Arlington, TX. Retrieved from http://repository.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/94626.
  6. Clement, G. & Levine, M. (2011). Status of pre-1978 analysis approach. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 813-829. doi:10.1353/pla.2011.0031.
  7. Columbia University Libraries/Information Services. (2011). Fair use checklist. Retrieved from http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/fair-use-checklist/.
  8. Crews, K. (2000). Copyright law and graduate research: new media, new rights, and your new dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest. Retrieved from http://www.umi.com/en-US/products/dissertations/copyright/.
  9. Edminster, J. & Moxley, J. (2002). Graduate education and the evolving genre of electronic theses and dissertations. Computers and Composition, 19(1), 89-104.
  10. Hirtle, P.B., Hudson, E. & Kenyon, A. (2009). Copyright and cultural institutions: guidelines for digitization for U.S. libraries, archives, and museums. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Library. Retrieved from http://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/14142/2/Hirtle- Copyright_final_RGB_lowres-cover1.pdf.
  11. Jones, R. & Andrew, T. (2005). Open access, open source, and e-theses: the development of the Edinburgh research archive. Program: electronic library and information systems, 39(3), 198-212. Retrieved from http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/811.
  12. Marcum, D. (2009). A moral and legal obligation: preservation in the digital age. Keynote address delivered at ETD 2009: Bridging the Knowledge Divide, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://snidely.dlib.vt.edu:8081/dspace/handle/2340/1140.
  13. McMillan, G. (2002). ETDS and libraries [White paper]. Retrieved from http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.129.5329&rep1&type=pdf.
  14. McMillan, G. (2009). Copyright and ETDs. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/ copyright/ETDCopyrightCitations2.pdf.
  15. McMillan, G., Ramirez, M., Dalton, J., Read, M. & Seamans, N. (2011). An investigation of ETDs as prior publications: findings from the 2011 NDLTD publishers survey. Paper contributed to ETD 2011 (14th), South Africa. Retrieved from http://dl.cs.uct.ac.za/ conferences/etd2011/papers/etd2011_mcmillan.pdf.
  16. Perry, M. & Callan, P. (2006). Legal protocols and practices for managing copyright in electronic theses. Proceedings of ETD 2006. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1495722.
  17. Ramirez, M. & McMillan, G. (2010). FERPA and student work: considerations for electronic theses and dissertations. D-Lib Magazine, 16(1/2). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/ramirez/01ramirez.html.
  18. Suber, P. (2008). Open access to electronic theses and dissertations. Desidoc Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(1), 25-34. Retrieved from http://publications.drdo.gov.in/ojs/index.php/djlit/article/view/149.
  19. U.S. Copyright Office. (August 2011). Circular 1, Copyright basics. Retrieved from http:// www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf.
  20. U.S. Copyright Office. (November 2009). FL-102, Fair use. Retrieved from http:// www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html.

Metadata for ETD Lifecycle Mgmt Bibliography

Metadata

PREMIS

  1. PREMIS Preservation Metadata Maintenance Activity(Library of Congress): http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/
  2. PREMIS Tutorials and Implementation Presentations materials: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/tutorials.html
  3. PREMIS OWL ontology (wiki page): http://premisontologypublic.pbworks.com/w/page/45987067/FrontPage
  4. Hastings, Samantha and Alemneh, Daniel (2010). Exploration of Adoption of Preservation Metadata in Cultural Heritage Institutions. Proceedings of the 73rd American Society for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T) Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29321
  5. "Implementing PREMIS: A Case Study of the Florida Digital Archive" by Devan Ray Donaldson and Paul Conway, in Library Hi-Tech, 2010: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0737-8831&volume=28&issue=2&articleid=1864754&show=pdf
  6. "Conformant Implementation of the PREMIS Data Dictionary By PREMIS Editorial Committee October 2010: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-conformance-oct2010.pdf
  7. "A Checklist for Documenting PREMIS-METS Decisions in a METS Profile" by Sally Vermaaten, May 2010: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis_mets_checklist.pdf
  8. Alemneh, Daniel (2009). An Examination of the Adoption of Preservation Metadata in Cultural Heritage Institutions: An Exploratory Study Using Diffusion of Innovations Theory. Doctoral Dissertation: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc9937/
  9. PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2008). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, Version 2.0. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf
  10. Caplan, P. & Guenther, R. (2005). Practical preservation: The PREMIS experience. Library Trends, 54, (1), 111-124. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/caplan_guenther-librarytrends.pdf

Authorities and Vocabularies

  1. Preservation Events: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationEvents.html
  2. Preservation Level Role: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationLevelRole.html
  3. Cryptographic Hash Functions: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/cryptographicHashFunctions.html

Digital Preservation

  1. Phillips, Mark and Alemneh, Daniel (2011) Data Desiccation: Facilitating Long-Term Access, Use, and Reuse of ETDs. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2011, Cape Town, South Africa: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc67625/
  2. von Suchodoletz, Dirk; Rechert, Klaus; and Welte, Randolph (2011) Automation of Flexible Migration Workflows. In the International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol. 6(1): http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/172/240
  3. von Suchodoletz, Dirk (2010)A Future Emulation and Automation Research Agenda: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2010/2771/pdf/10291.vonSuchodoletzDirk.Paper.2771.pdf
  4. Schultz, Matt and Skinner, Katherine (2010) A Guide to Distributed Digital Preservation: http://www.metaarchive.org/sites/default/files/GDDP_Educopia.pdf
  5. Rumsey, S., O’Steen, B. (2008). OAI-ORE, PRESERV2 and Digital Preservation. Ariadne, 57, 8p. : http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue57/rumsey-osteen/

Best Practices and Guidelines Resources

  1. ANSI/NISO Z39.87 - 2006 (R2011) Data Dictionary - Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images: www.niso.org/standards/z39-87-2006/
  2. Alemneh, D., Hastings, S., Hartman, C. (2002). “A metadata approach to preservation of digital resources: the University of North Texas Libraries’ experience.” First Monday. 7(8), 25p. : http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/981/902
  3. COUNTER (Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources): http://www.projectcounter.org/about.html
  4. NISO (2012). Making Good on the Promise of ERM: A Standards and Best Practices Discussion Paper: http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/7946/Making_Good_on_the_Promise_of_ERM.pdf
  5. NISO Framework Working Group. (2007, December). A framework of guidance for building good digital collections, 3rd ed. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/framework3.pdf
  6. ONIX for Licensing Terms (OLT): http://www.editeur.org/85/Overview/
    1. OLT is family of messaging formats for communication of rights information. It is built on a consistent underlying model of rights and usages.
  7. Shibboleth: http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/
    1. The Shibboleth System is a standards based, open source software package for web single sign-on across or within organizational boundaries. It allows sites to make informed authorization decisions for individual access of protected online resources in a privacy-preserving manner.
  8. WorldCat Registry: http://www.worldcat.org/registry/Institutions
    1. The WorldCat Registry is a Web-based directory for libraries and library consortia. It is an authoritative single source for information that defines institutional identity, services, relationships, contacts and other key data often shared with third parties
  9. Dappert, A and Enders,M. (2010). "Digital Preservation Metadata Standards" in Information Standards Quarterly 22(2). Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/FE_Dappert_Enders_MetadataStds_isqv22no2.pdf
  10. Enders, M.(2010). A METS based information package for long term preservation of web archives: http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/dp/ipres2010/papers/enders-70.pdf
  11. Toshiyuki G. (2007). “Preservation metadata: current situation and future perspectives.”Joho Kanri 50(2), 74-86 : http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/johokanri/50/2/50_74/_article
  12. NISO. (2004). Understanding Metadata. National Information Standards Organization. Online: http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf

Other Relevant Links

  1. Digital Library Federation: http://www.diglib.org/
  2. Standardization (German-Europe): http://www.dnb.de/EN/Standardisierung/standardisierung_node.html
  3. InSPECT (Investigating the Significant Properties of Electronic Content Over Time) project: www.significantproperties.org.uk/
  4. Internet Archive: http://www.archive.org/index.php
  5. International Internet Preservation Consortium: http://netpreserve.org/about/index.php
  6. METS: www.loc.gov/standards/mets/
  7. MIX: www.loc.gov/standards/mix/
  8. MPeG-21 dIdl: www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=35366
  9. National Archives of Canada: Preservation Activities: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/preservation/index-e.html
  10. National Digital Information Infrastructure Preservation Program (NDIIPP): http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/
  11. The National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA): http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsa/
  12. National Library of Australia: PANDORA: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/
  13. National Library of Sweden: Kulturarw3 – The Swedish Web Archive: http://www.kb.se/english/find/internet/websites/
  14. OAIS: www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprojects/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
  15. Planets: www.planets-project.eu/
  16. PremIS: www.loc.gov/standards/premis/
  17. Pronom: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/PronoM/Default.aspx
  18. textMD: www.loc.gov/standards/textMD/

Tools and Software

  1. PREMIS in METS Toolbox: http://pim.fcla.edu/
  2. DAITSS (Dark Archive in the Sunshine State): http://daitss.fcla.edu/
    1. DAITSS is a digital preservation repository application developed by the Florida Center for Library Automation FCLA with some support from the IMLS.
  3. TIPR repository exchange Package: wiki.fcla.edu:8000/tiPr

Access Levels & Embargoes for ETDs Bibliography

  1. Andrew, T. “Intellectual Property and Electronic Theses” (2004). http://hdl.handle.net/1842/612.
  2. Brown, J. “Literature Review of Research into Attitudes Towards Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs)” (2010). http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/20424/.
  3. Brown, J., and K. Sadler. “Vision, Impact, Success: Mandating Electronic Theses.” Case Studies of E-theses Mandates in Practice in the UK Higher Education Sector, Report by UCL (University College London) (2010).
  4. Copeland, S. “Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Promoting hidden research.” Policy Futures in Education 6, no. 1 (2008): 87–96.
  5. Greig, M. “Implementing Electronic Theses at the University of Glasgow: Cultural Challenges.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 29, no. 3 (2005): 326–335.
  6. “LISTSERV 16.0 - ETD-L List at LISTSERV.VT.EDU.” Listserv. ETD-L Home Page, n.d. http://listserv.vt.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ETD-L.
  7. McCutcheon, A.M. “Impact of Publishers’ Policy on Electronic Thesis and Dissertation (ETD) Distribution Options Within the United States”. Ohio University, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1273584209.
  8. McMillan, Gail, Marisa L. Ramirez, Joan Dalton, Max Read, and Nancy H. Seamans. “An Investigation of ETDs as Prior Publications: Findings from the 2011 NDLTD Publishers’ Survey”. Cape Town, South Africa, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/11338.
  9. Owen, T., T. Hackman, and T. Harrod. “ETDs in Lock-Down: Trends” (2009). http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9087.
  10. Ramirez, Marisa, and Gail McMillan. “FERPA and Student Work.” D-Lib Magazine 16, no. 1/2 (January 2010). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/ramirez/01ramirez.html.
  11. Robertson, Wendy C., and Rebecca Routh. “ILA_ACRL_Robertson_Routh.pptx” presented at the ILA/ACRL Spring Conference, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, April 23, 2010. http://ir.uiowa.edu/lib_pubs/52.
  12. Satyanarayana, KV, and B.R. Babu. “Trends in the Development of E-Theses in India: Issues, Constraints, and Solutions.” In 10th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Uppsala, Sweden, 2007.
  13. Seamans, Nancy H. “Electronic Theses and Dissertations as Prior Publications: What the Editors Say.” Library Hi Tech 21, no. 1 (2003): 56–61.
  14. Stock, C., and Grey Literature Network Service; GreyNet. “Open Access to Full Text and ETDs in Europe: Improving Accessibility Through the Choice of Language?” The Grey Journal 4, no. 2 (2008): 73–82.

ETD Formats & Complex Objects Bibliography

General

  1. http://listserv.vt.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=ETD-L --- searchable archive of NDLTD listserv
  2. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/about/deepbluepreservation.jsp --- U Mich.'s Multi-Level Preservation and Format Support Policy
  3. http://conservancy.umn.edu/pol-preservation.jsp --- U Minn.'s Digital Conservancy Preservation Policy
  4. http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/dp/plato/intro.html --- Plato, the Preservation Planning Tool
  5. http://netpreserve.org/publications/NLA_2009_IIPC_Report.pdf --- IIPC's ...PRESERVATION OF WEB ARCHIVES…
  6. http://lib.colostate.edu/repository/csu-digital-repository-preservation-format-support-policy --- CSU's Preservation & Format Support Policy
  7. http://wiki.fcla.edu:8000/TIPR/21 TIPR’s Repository eXchange Package spec
  8. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/hitchcock/05hitchcock.html --- D-Lib (2007): ...Service Provider Models for IRs
  9. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/189/254 --- W. Aaron Collie & Michael Witt, A Practice and Value Proposal for Doctoral Dissertation Data Curation, The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6 (2), 2011.
  10. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/NDLTD/BoD200906/NDLTDPreservationPlan20090606.pdf --- NDLTD Preservation Strategy with the MetaArchive Cooperative by Gail McMillan & Katherine Skinner (2009)
  11. https://github.com/usnationalarchives --- useful tools for metadata harvesting and fixity checking
  12. https://siarchives.si.edu/sites/default/files/pdfs/bornDigitalVideoPreservation2011_0.pdf Smithsonian Institution Archives’ “Born Digital Video Preservation: A Final Report”
  13. http://crl.acrl.org/content/63/5/388.full.pdf+html Toward Developing a Framework of Cost Elements for Preserving Authentic Electronic Records into Perpetuity by Shelby Sanett. College & Research Libraries September 2002 (392) 388-404.
  14. Sound Directions: Digital Preservation and Access for Global Audio Heritage http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/projects/sounddirections/
  15. JPEG 2000 - a Practical Digital Preservation Standard? by Robert BuckleyDigital Preservation CoalitionTechnology Watch Series Report 08-01 February 2008 www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/dpctw08-01.pdf
  16. Born‐Digital Video Preservation: A Final Report by Andrea Shahmohammadi, Smithsonian Institution Archives, February 2011, https://siarchives.si.edu/sites/default/files/pdfs/bornDigitalVideoPreservation2011_0.pdf

Data wrangling: organizing digital content

  1. Avoiding the Calf-Path: Digital Preservation Readiness for Growing Collections and Distributed Preservation Networks by Martin Halbert, Katherine Skinner and Gail McMillan, Society for Imaging Science and Technology: Archiving 2008 Final Program and Proceedings, 86-91.

File/Folder naming principles and conventions

  1. http://www.records.ncdcr.gov/erecords/filenaming_20080508_final.pdf

Normalization/File Formats

  1. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/ --- digital content format and their sustainability factors
  2. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub93/contents.html --- Risk Management of Digital Information: A File Format Investigation (2000)
  3. http://www.gdfr.info/udfr.html Unified Digital Formats Registry
  4. http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/droid/index.php?title=Main_Page
  5. DROID (Digital Record Object Identification), an automatic file format identification tool
  6. http://www.archivematica.org/wiki/index.php?title=Media_type_preservation_plans --- normalize upon ingest strategy
  7. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/digital-initiatives/012018-2240.02-e.html --- Library and Archives Canada’s File Format Guidelines for Preservation and Long-term Access
  8. http://www.portico.org/digital-preservation/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Portico-Format-Monitoring-Policies.pdf --- PORTICO's Format Monitoring and Migration Policy
  9. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/about/deepbluepreservation.jsp --- Deep Blue Preservation and Format Support Policy
  10. http://fileformats.wordpress.com/ --- file formats blog

Complex content objects

  1. http://people.cs.vt.edu/~shpark/html5etds.html --- Making hypermedia ETDs in HTML5 (at Virginia Tech)
  2. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/multimedia/videos/bagit0609.html --- Library of Congress; Bagit: Transferring Content for Digital Preservation

Format migration scenarios: emulation and/or migration

  1. http://fclaweb.fcla.edu/uploads/353-713-1-PB.pdf --- Lydia T. Motyka (FCLA) presentation at USetdA 2011: What do you do when your file formats become obsolete?
  2. http://dpbestflow.org/migration/file-format-migration --- American Society of Media Photographers
  3. http://geopreservation.org geospatial data preservation

ETD Cost Modeling Bibliography

Caveat: These are mostly resources that are about figuring out the actual costs of ETD initiatives, from equipment to personnel, but not business or economic models.

This bibliography is drawn heavily from the BRTF: Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access's Selective Literature Review, and the JISC Lifecycle Information for e-Literature (LIFE), though I began by searching Google and LISTA: Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts through Virginia Tech's EBSCOhost [LISTA indexes more than 600 periodicals, plus books, research reports and proceedings. Subject coverage includes librarianship, classification, cataloging, bibliometrics, online information retrieval, information management and more.]

  1. Ashley, K. (2000). Digital Archive Costs: Facts and Fallacies. Paper presented at the DLM Forum '99. from http://ec.europa.eu/archives/ISPO/dlm/fulltext/full_ashl_en.htm.
  2. A yris, P ., Davies, R., McLeod, R., Miao, R., Shenton, H., & Wheatley, P . (2008). The LIFE2 Final Project Report: JISC. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/11758/1/11758.pdf
  3. Beagrie, N., Chruszcz, J., & Lavoie, B. (2008). Keeping Research Data Safe: A Cost Model and Guidance for UK Universities. London: JISC. http://www.beagrie.com/krds.php Phase 1 (2008). Phase 2 (2010) http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.aspx#downloads
  4. Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access. Final report. Sustainable Economics for a Digital Planet: Ensuring Long-Term Access to Digital Information. Feb. 2010. http://brtf.scsd.edu.
    1. Related links: Eakin, Lorraine, Amy Friedlander, Roger Schonfeld with contributions by Sayeed Choudhury. “A Selective Literature Review on Digital Preservation Sustainability.” http://brtf.sdsc.edu/biblio/Cost_Literature_Review.pdf
  5. Australasian Digital Theses Program: Draft Business Plan 2006-2009. (2007) Linked from http://www.caul.edu.au/caul-programs/australasian-digital-theses/adt2007future; but directly at http://www.caul.edu.au/content/upload/files/adt/adt2006-2009businessplanV3.doc
  6. Crespo, Arturo, and Hector Garcia Molina. (2001). Cost-Driven Design for Archival Repositories. Paper presented at the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. http://www-db.stanford.edu/~crespo/publications/cost.pdf.
  7. Davies, Richard. (2008). “Lifecycle Information for e-Literature (LIFE2) Final Project Report” [summary]. http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/394/
  8. Davies, Richard; Paul Ayris, Rory McCleod, Hellen Sheton, Paul Wheatley. (2007). “How much does it cost? The LIFE Project Costing Models for Digital Curation and Preservation.” Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, Vol. 17 Issue 3/4, p. 233-241. http://liber.library.uu.nl/
  9. Hole, Brian, and Paul Wheatley, Li Lin, Patrick Mccann, Brian Aitken, L I Lin. The Life3 Predictive Costing Tool for Digital Collections. http://www.life.ac.uk/3/documentation.shtml [URL for Life3 documentation]
  10. Jewell, Christine. [Waterloo] (1999) “Electronic Thesis and Dissertation System: Business Plan.” UW Library Planning and Priorities Group. http://www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/ETD/business_plan.PDF
  11. Kejser, Ulla Bøgvad; Anders Bo Nielsen; Alex Thirifays. “Cost Model for Digital Curation: Cost of Digital Migration” (2009) iPRES 2009: the Sixth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects. Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4d09c0bb (linked from http://en.nationaalarchief.nl/kennisbank/cost-model-for-digital-curation-cost-of-digital-migration- 2009)
  12. McLeod, R.; Wheatley, P.; Ayris, P. (2006) Lifecycle Information for E-literature: Full Report from the LIFE Project. LIFE Project: London, UK. Should be linked from http://www.life.ac.uk/ http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1854/
  13. McMillan, Gail. [Virginia Tech] (~1999) “Supporting ETDs at a Typical University Library." http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/data/setup.html
  14. Sanett, S. (2002). Toward Developing a Framework of Cost Elements for Preserving Authentic Electronic Records into Perpetuity. College & Research Libraries, 63, 388-404. http://crl.acrl.org/content/63/5/388.full.pdf+html
  15. Science and Technology Council. (2007). The Digital Dilemma: Strategic Issues in Archiving and Accessing Digital Motion Picture Materials: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (A.M.P .A.S.).
  16. Slats, Jacqueline, and Remco Verdegem. “Digital Preservation Cost Model” (2005) [XLS (127 KB) | 17-12-2010] Nationaal Archief/Testbed Digitale Bewaring. [National Archives of the Netherlands: http://en.nationaalarchief.nl/kennisbank/digital-preservation-cost-model-2005 kostenmodel_in_excel_versie_1.2_final.xls
  17. Wheatley, Paul, and Paul Ayris, Richard Davies, Rory Mcleod, Helen Shenton. (2007). The LIFE Model v1.1. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/4831/

Options for ETD Programs Bibliography

  1. Brown, Josh. “Literature Review of Research into Attitudes towards Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs).” UCL Eprints (2010). http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/20424/
  2. Copeland, Susan. "Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Promoting 'Hidden' Research." Policy Futures in Education 6, no. 1 (2008): 87-96.
  3. Fox, Edward A., Shahrooz Feizabadi, Joseph M. Moxley, and Christian R. Weisser, eds. Electronic Theses and Dissertations: A Sourcebook for Educators, Students, and Librarians. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004.
  4. Fyffe, Richard, and William C. Welburn. "ETDs, Scholarly Communication, and Campus Collaboration." College & Research Libraries News 69, no. 3 (2008): 152-155. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crlnews/2008/mar/etdsschcommcampucollab.cfm
  5. Lippincott, Joan K. "Institutional Strategies and Policies for Electronic Theses and Dissertations." EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin, no. 13 (2006). http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0613.pdf
  6. Lippincott, Joan K., and Clifford A. Lynch. "ETDs and Graduate Education: Programs and Prospects." Research Library Issues, no. 270 (June 2010): 6-15. http://publications.arl.org/rli270/7
  7. Reeves, Sharon. "How to Set Up an ETD Submission Program." NDLTD Resources Website. http://www.ndltd.org/resources/how-to-set-up-an-etd-submission-program
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox